Bridge rate-limiter / chain-pause as positive mitigant
Polymarket's assessment for RD-F-185 — scored red on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Polymarket does not operate a bridge. No per-window outflow rate-limiter in CTFExchange V2 (Pausable.sol = binary toggle only). No chain-level pause capability controlled by Polymarket. UMA CTF Adapter 2-day flag window is a resolution safety mechanism, not an outflow rate-limiter. F185 positive mitigant criteria not met.
Sources #
- GitHubPausable.sol — binary pause/unpause only; no rate limiter or outflow capPolymarket/ctf-exchange-v2/Pausable.solretrieved 2026-04-29
- Profile §7 — has_bridge_surface = false; Polymarket does not operate a bridgepolymarket-profile-no-bridgeretrieved 2026-04-29
Methodology #
Determine whether the bridge implements a per-window outflow rate-limiter (and at what cap), and whether the protocol team can trigger a chain-level or validator-set emergency pause.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol polymarket factor RD-F-185 score red collected_at 2026-04-29 16:25:39