Real-capital social-engineering persona
Raydium's assessment for RD-F-184 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No evidence found of a 'team contributor' or 'external integrator' persona using >= $1M of real-capital deposits to Raydium or peer protocols to build credibility ahead of a social-engineering attack. The UNC4736 Drift Protocol DPRK attack (April 2026) involved this pattern targeting Drift — not Raydium. Raydium's team has been stable since 2021 with no late-arriving contributor persona flagged in any threat intelligence report. Confidence is low because this factor is M-only (manual curator) and requires affirmative curator investigation to confirm absence.
Sources #
- URLLessons from the Drift Hack | ChainalysisChainalysis — Drift lessons; UNC4736 social engineering against Drift, not Raydiumretrieved 2026-04-29
Methodology #
Determine whether a curator-flagged "team contributor" or "external integrator" persona has ≥$1M of attributed real-capital deposits to the target protocol or peer protocols, potentially used to build credibility ahead of a social-engineering attack.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →