Stablecoin depeg >2% on shared-LP venue
Sanctum's assessment for RD-F-104 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
T-09 v1 launch signal (Tier B). Sanctum's core products hold SOL-denominated LSTs (jitoSOL, mSOL, bSOL, jupSOL, BNSOL, bbSOL), not stablecoins. Infinity pool basket is 100% LST/SOL-denominated; no USDC/USDT pool in Sanctum's direct custody. Stablecoin depeg does not trigger an RD-F-104 event for Sanctum's core holdings. Secondary downstream effect (reduced DeFi collateral demand) exists but does not meet the signal threshold (protocol exposure ≥5% of TVL to the depegged stable).
Sources #
- DocsSanctum Infinity docs — pool compositionSanctum Infinity pool composition — LSTs only (jitoSOL, mSOL, bSOL, jupSOL, BNSOL, bbSOL); no stablecoin exposure in core productsretrieved 2026-05-04
Methodology #
Detect whether a stablecoin in this protocol's dependency graph depegs >2% on a venue with shared liquidity.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →