Bridge rate-limiter / chain-pause as positive mitigant

Sanctum's assessment for RD-F-185 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Sanctum has no canonical bridge component (has_bridge_surface: false per data cache; cross_chain: false). Cat 10 is N/A for this protocol. There is no bridge over which a rate-limiter would provide a mitigant. Factor is N/A by design — applies only to bridge-touching protocols.

Sources #

Docs
DefiLlama API: Sanctum — no bridge surfaceData cache: layerzero.present = false; has_bridge_surface = false; profile §7 confirms no bridge surfaceretrieved 2026-05-04

Methodology #

Determine whether the bridge implements a per-window outflow rate-limiter (and at what cap), and whether the protocol team can trigger a chain-level or validator-set emergency pause.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol sanctum factor RD-F-185 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-04 18:49:23