★ Low-threshold multisig vs TVL
Save (formerly Solend)'s assessment for RD-F-028 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
The program upgrade path is a bare single EOA — there is no multisig in the upgrade path. No threshold to evaluate. Per multipli/marinade precedent, do not double-count F027 + F028. The two Squads multisigs (4-of-6 treasury; 2-of-4 LM) govern only funds, not program code.
Sources #
- InternalProcess learnings — F027/F028 no double-count rule.research/protocols/process-learnings.md §Per-specialist governance-admin-analyst — multipli/marinade precedent for F027+F028 not doublingretrieved 2026-05-17
- Save profile — multisig scope clarification.research/protocols/save/00-profile.md §11 [MULTISIG SCOPE CLARIFICATION] — Squads multisigs govern treasury/LM funds ONLY, not program upgradesretrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Determine whether the multisig threshold is abnormally low relative to TVL peer cohort (e.g., 2-of-3 for a protocol with >$100M TVL where peer norm is 5-of-8).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol save factor RD-F-028 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-17 15:20:15