defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Sudden admin-rescue/ACL change without discussion

Save (formerly Solend)'s assessment for RD-F-123 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

SLND1 emergency proposal (2022-06-19): authored by Rooter (team founder), opened for ~6h vote window with zero preceding governance-forum discussion. 88% of voting power from single address per CoinTelegraph. ~1.13% effective community participation. Granted team emergency admin power to seize a whale's wallet — a non-routine ACL-class action with no corresponding GitHub PR, issue, or governance-forum precedent discussion. Reversed by SLND2 within 24h; no funds taken. Yellow per §7-rule-5: documented insider-governance overreach, not malicious theft. The single-key EOA upgrade authority is disclosed structural centralization, not concealment — F123 scored on conduct evidence only.

Sources #

Methodology #

Determine whether any admin-rescue function or ACL change was committed to the repo or executed on-chain without corresponding public discussion in issues, PRs, or governance forum.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol save factor RD-F-123 score yellow collected_at 2026-05-17 15:20:15