First-depositor / share-inflation guard

Spiko's assessment for RD-F-075 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Not a share-based vault; not susceptible to first-depositor inflation attacks. Token supply is minted/burned by whitelisted MINTER/BURNER roles (Spiko's own controlled process via Permission Manager), not by permissionless user deposit calls. No share-accounting attack surface exists. Lending-vault-specific factor per taxonomy PD-024.

Sources #

Internal
Spiko profile — permissioned mint/burn architecture confirming no first-depositor attack surface00-profile.md §3 'Permission Manager contract governs all privileged roles (MINTER, BURNER, WHITELISTER, REDEMPTION_EXECUTOR, PAUSER, super-admin)'retrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether the vault has a first-depositor guard (seed deposit on deploy, virtual-share offset, or floor-check).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol spiko factor RD-F-075 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-15 22:52:13