Security-Council threshold reduction (RT)
Stake DAO's assessment for RD-F-182 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Batch-24 Cat 6B signal (T-09 v1.1 candidate). Not applicable by architecture — Stake DAO does not have a Security Council construct separate from the main governance multisig. The governance multisig (0xf930ebbd, 4-of-7 threshold) IS the admin authority, gated through the 8-hour Timelock. No dedicated 'Security Council' with a distinct threshold exists that could be weakened in Drift-Protocol style (3/5 to 2/5 + timelock removal). SDGP-67 confirmed a signer replacement that explicitly does not modify the underlying multisig threshold. No threshold reduction event detected. Signal would not fire today because the triggering pattern (SC threshold reduction OR timelock removal by a separate SC) is architecturally absent.
Sources #
- EtherscanStake DAO: Governance | EtherscanGovernance multisig 0xf930ebbd — Safe Mastercopy 1.1.1; single-layer governance authority with Timelock gating; no Security Council constructretrieved 2026-05-16
- SDGP-67: Multisig Signer Replacement | Stake DAO GovernanceSDGP-67 — signer replacement explicitly confirms no threshold modification to the 4-of-7 governance multisigretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Detect in real-time whether the bridge/protocol Security Council multisig executes a threshold reduction (e.g. 3/5 → 2/5), timelock removal, or new-signer addition within ≤14 days of either of those events.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →