Bridge rate-limiter / chain-pause as positive mitigant
StakeWise v3's assessment for RD-F-185 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Not applicable. StakeWise v3 has no bridge surface (has_bridge_surface false, layerzero.present false, coverage_flags.layerzero_bridge false in data cache). RD-F-185 measures bridge rate-limiter and chain-pause as positive mitigants for bridge exploit scenarios — structurally inapplicable to this LST protocol with no cross-chain bridge.
Sources #
- InternalStakeWise data cache — no bridge surface00-data-cache.json: coverage_flags.layerzero_bridge false; sources.layerzero.present false; 00-profile.md §7: has_bridge_surface falseretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether the bridge implements a per-window outflow rate-limiter (and at what cap), and whether the protocol team can trigger a chain-level or validator-set emergency pause.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →