Cross-chain bridge unverified mint pattern

Superstate's assessment for RD-F-106 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Native-per-chain issuance confirmed; no bridge exists. Profile §7: has_bridge_surface = false, is_a_bridge = false. No cross-chain bridge activity (deposit src, unverified mint dst) is possible in absence of a bridge. Not applicable.

Sources #

Internal
Superstate profile §7 — no bridge surface00-profile.md §7: has_bridge_surface = false; is_a_bridge = false; native-per-chain issuance: Ethereum EIP-1967 proxy, Solana SPL Token-2022, Plume EIP-1967 proxy — no lock-bridge, no CCIP/LayerZero/Wormhole endpointretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Detect cross-chain activity consistent with an unverified mint on the destination chain (deposit on source without corresponding verified proof on dest).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol superstate factor RD-F-106 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 00:06:37