Bridge rate-limiter / chain-pause as positive mitigant

Superstate's assessment for RD-F-185 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Superstate uses native-per-chain token issuance with no cross-chain bridge contract. Profile confirms has_bridge_surface=false; no CCIP, LayerZero, or Wormhole endpoint found. No bridge surface means no rate-limiter is relevant. F185 is a positive-mitigant factor for bridge protocols; not applicable here.

Sources #

Docs
Superstate Documentation - Native Per-Chain IssuanceSuperstate uses native-per-chain issuance (Ethereum EIP-1967, Solana SPL Token-2022, Plume EIP-1967); no bridge surface confirmedretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether the bridge implements a per-window outflow rate-limiter (and at what cap), and whether the protocol team can trigger a chain-level or validator-set emergency pause.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol superstate factor RD-F-185 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 00:06:37