Storage-layout collision risk across upgrades
Sushi (SushiSwap) — v2 + v3 + Trident + BentoBox/Kashi + SushiXSwap's assessment for RD-F-142 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Core AMM contracts (V2/V3 factories, BentoBox) are non-upgradeable — storage layout collision risk N/A. RouteProcessor contracts are not proxied (new immutable deployments, not upgrades). Storage layout collision factor does not apply to this protocol's architecture.
Sources #
- Internal00-profile.md §3Profile §3 — all core contracts are immutable non-proxy deploymentsretrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Determine whether the OZ upgrades-plugin or manual review flags a storage-layout collision risk between implementation versions.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol sushi factor RD-F-142 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 19:50:37