defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Prior exploit count

Uniswap (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-077 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

V2: 0 direct protocol exploits in 72 months. V3: 0 direct protocol exploits in 60 months. July 2022 phishing targeted user wallets via social engineering — protocol not exploited. V2 oracle consumer failures (Visor Finance, Inverse Finance) are consumer protocol failures, NOT V2 exploits — V2 TWAP worked as designed. Combined: green (0 direct protocol exploits).

Detail #

Hacksdatabase grep over all 45 files referencing 'uniswap': no file records a direct V2 or V3 protocol exploit. Profile §10 seed list confirms zero V2 or V3 smart-contract-level incidents. Visor Finance (Dec 2021, ~$8.2M loss): the hack was a Visor Finance vVISR deposit() reentrancy + ownership bypass — V2 contracts operated as designed. Visor was a V3 LP manager that consumed V2 as a price oracle; V2 TWAP worked correctly. Inverse Finance Apr 2022 (~$15.6M) and Jun 2022 (~$5.8M): flash loan AMM oracle manipulation exploited Inverse Finance's oracle consumer logic — V2 TWAP accumulator worked as designed and V2 docs explicitly warn about manipulation cost. July 2022 phishing (~$4.7–8M): fake UniswapLP token airdrop targeting V3 LP addresses — social engineering, not a smart contract exploit. Protocol TVL was not touched. The Universal Router reentrancy (GHSA-7m37-cx35-qgmr) was patched before deployment — no user funds were ever at risk, so it is not an incident. REKT News, DeFiYield, SlowMist: no Uniswap protocol-level entry found in research. Score: green.

Sources #

Methodology #

Count the number of distinct incidents in the hack database affecting this protocol.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol uniswap factor RD-F-077 score green collected_at 2026-05-12 10:36:11