Unusual pending/executed proposal ratio
Uniswap (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-110 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
V2+V3 combined: Signal requires on-chain ProposalCreated/ProposalExecuted event ratio monitoring from GovernorBravoDelegator (0x408ED6354d4973f66138C91495F2f2FCbd8724C3). V2 has no governor. V3 governance activity in 2026: UNIfication/tokenomics proposals — coordinated and purposeful, not anomalous. Signal infrastructure (governance baseline analytics) not configured in static assessment. Gray: ratio cannot be computed without continuous tracking baseline.
Detail #
Signal fires when unusual ratio of pending to executed governance proposals vs trailing-30d baseline occurs (>3 sigma). For V2: no governor exists; N/A for V2 portion. For V3: GovernorBravoDelegator is the on-chain governor. 2026 governance activity: UNIfication/tokenomics proposals queued and executed in March 2026 — normal governance cadence. Without a 30-day baseline of proposal ratios, the signal cannot be computed. Gray: baseline analytics not configured in static assessment; requires continuous monitoring.
Sources #
- URLTally Uniswap Governance PortalTally governance portal — Uniswap DAO proposals — normal 2026 governance cadence observedretrieved 2026-05-12
Methodology #
Detect an unusual ratio of pending-to-executed governance proposals versus the trailing-30-day baseline.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →