Fork retains upstream audit coverage

Uniswap (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-131 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Not a fork — upstream audit retention question is moot. All audits are original direct engagements.

Detail #

V2 has direct audit coverage from dapp.org.uk. V3 has direct coverage from ToB + ABDK + OZ + Spearbit + Chainsecurity across the full stack. No inherited audit coverage from any upstream.

Sources #

GitHub
v3-core audits — ToB (March 2021) and ABDK (March-April 2021)v3-core audits directoryretrieved 2026-05-12

Methodology #

Determine whether the fork's deployed code is covered by either: (a) the upstream audit plus a delta-audit for fork-specific changes, or (b) a fresh independent audit of the fork.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol uniswap factor RD-F-131 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-12 10:36:11