defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Fork has different economic parameters than upstream

Uniswap (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-132 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Not a fork — no upstream economic parameters to deviate from. V2 and V3 define their own original economic parameters. Factor not applicable.

Detail #

V2 defined its own fee structure (0.3% LP fee) and V3 defined its own fee tiers (0.01%, 0.05%, 0.3%, 1.0%). Both are original designs with no upstream parameter comparison applicable.

Sources #

  • Curator note
    Profile §5 — N/A original protocolProfile §5 — original protocol designretrieved 2026-05-12

Methodology #

Determine whether the fork's economic parameters (collateral factor, LTV, fee structure) differ from upstream audited defaults without a subsequent re-audit.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol uniswap factor RD-F-132 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-12 10:36:11