defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Leaked credential on paste/sentry site

Uniswap (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-164 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

V2+V3 combined: No paste-site, Sentry.io, or GitHub secret scanner reports referencing Uniswap Labs infrastructure endpoints, API keys, or admin credentials identified from public-source OSINT. Uniswap GitHub org is fully public — no credentials visible in public repos. V2 and V3 core contracts are immutable — even a credential leak for Uniswap Labs servers does not enable protocol-level compromise. Uniswap Labs is a mature corporate entity with established security practices (Cantina $2.25M max bounty). Green based on available public sources.

Detail #

Signal fires when a public paste site, Sentry.io, or credential dump references Uniswap Labs infrastructure endpoints or admin keys. Critical immunity: V2 and V3 core contracts are immutable — there are no admin private keys that could be leaked that would enable on-chain protocol compromise. Credential leaks could affect the Uniswap Labs web infrastructure (app.uniswap.org hosting) or GitHub organization access, but not the on-chain AMM contracts. Uniswap Labs has a mature security program: Cantina bug bounty ($2.25M max), security@uniswap.org contact, well-known security researchers engaged. No credential leak reports found in public search for Uniswap Labs. Green based on available public sources.

Sources #

Methodology #

Determine whether a public paste site, Sentry-alt, or credential-dump references protocol infrastructure endpoints or API keys.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol uniswap factor RD-F-164 score green collected_at 2026-05-12 10:36:11