Protocol social channel has scam-coordinator flag
Uniswap (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-165 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
V2+V3 combined: Official Discord (discord.gg/uniswap) and governance forum (gov.uniswap.org). No flagged scam-coordinator identified as admin of official Uniswap Discord or governance forum in public-source review. 2022 phishing attack operated via external channels (mass token airdrop), not compromised official channels. Blockaid integration provides defensive detection against token-level scam vectors. Green based on available public sources.
Detail #
Signal fires when protocol-adjacent social channel admin is flagged on curator scam-coordinator watchlist. For Uniswap: no such flag identified in available public sources. The 2022 phishing attack (fake UniswapLP token airdrop) was executed through social engineering (malicious token airdrop to LP wallet addresses), not through compromised official Discord or Telegram channels. The Uniswap governance forum (gov.uniswap.org) is moderated by the Uniswap Foundation — no evidence of infiltration. General scam activity targeting Uniswap users (fake support bots, scam tokens) is endemic but these operate outside official channels. Green based on available public sources; requires curator social watchlist for definitive coverage.
Sources #
- URLUniswap Governance ForumUniswap governance forum (gov.uniswap.org) — Uniswap Foundation moderated, no infiltration evidenceretrieved 2026-05-12
Methodology #
Determine whether a protocol-adjacent social channel admin is flagged on the curator scam-coordinator watchlist.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →