Permissionless-pool lending oracle
Uniswap (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-181 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Factor applies to lending protocols that accept spot prices from permissionlessly-created DEX pools as collateral oracle input. Uniswap V2 and V3 are DEX protocols — no lending surface, no collateral, no borrow functionality. N/A by factor definition and protocol type per DEX template.
Detail #
Profile §1: protocol_type = dex. Data cache coverage_flags.lending_protocol: false. Profile §7: no borrow or collateral surface in V2 or V3. The attack vector (fake pools seeded as collateral oracle inputs to a lending market) is structurally inapplicable to an AMM DEX.
Sources #
- Curator noteDEX template — F181 N/A by factor definition for non-lending protocolsProcess-learnings DEX template: F181 N/A by factor definition for non-lending protocols. Profile §1: protocol_type = dex. Data cache: coverage_flags.lending_protocol: false.retrieved 2026-05-12
Methodology #
Determine whether the lending protocol accepts spot prices from a DEX where any user can permissionlessly create new pools, without requiring a TWAP window, liquidity floor, or token-age minimum on the venue side.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →