Breakage analysis per dependency
Yearn Finance's assessment for RD-F-052 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Yearn's official protocol risk documentation (docs.yearn.fi/developers/security/risks/protocol-risks) documents per-protocol-type failure modes for all major dependencies: lending (liquidation failures, oracle errors, smart contract risk), AMMs (liquidity shortages, impermanent loss, fee reduction), leverage protocols (collateralization failures, oracle-driven liquidation). However, the analysis is category-level, not per-strategy or per-dependency severity matrix. Historical incidents (2021 Curve manipulation yDAI, 2023 Fulcrum misconfiguration yUSDT) confirm that breakage analysis was insufficient pre-incident. Current documentation is substantially improved. Yellow: documented at category level but not structured as per-dependency severity map.
Sources #
- URLRekt.news — Yearn Feb 2021 (Curve dependency failure)Historical breakage: 2021 Curve manipulation (oracle-adjacent) and 2023 Fulcrum misconfigurationretrieved 2026-05-16
- Yearn Finance Protocol RisksProtocol risks page: per-protocol-type failure modes documentedretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Produce a short per-dependency text describing which protocol functions halt or degrade and impact severity if each declared dependency fails.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →