defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Formal verification coverage

Beefy Finance's assessment for RD-F-009 — scored red on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No formal verification engagement found. Certora conducted a CLM 'audit' (2024-06-30) but Certora's SecurityReports portfolio (their FV engagement archive) does not list Beefy Finance, and Certora's blog has no Beefy entry — strongly indicating this was a standard manual audit by Certora staff, not a Certora Prover FV engagement. No FV spec files (.spec) found in beefy-contracts. Zero declared critical invariants covered by FV proof.

Sources #

  • URL
    Certora Blogcertora.com/blog — no Beefy Finance FV blog post foundretrieved 2026-05-16
  • GitHub
    Certora SecurityReports Portfoliogithub.com/Certora/SecurityReports — Beefy Finance absent from Certora FV portfolioretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine the percentage of protocol-declared critical invariants covered by a formal verification proof (Certora Prover, Kani, Halmos, or equivalent).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol beefy factor RD-F-009 score red collected_at 2026-05-16 13:10:30