Handle reuse across failed/rugged projects

Hyperlane's assessment for RD-F-118 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No evidence of Twitter/Discord/GitHub handle reuse across prior failed or rugged projects. Abacus Network Twitter handle (@abacus_network) dates to May 2022 and transitions to Hyperlane branding — a consistent brand evolution, not an alias change after a rug. No named founder has a documented handle-reuse pattern across adverse projects.

Sources #

URL
Introducing Hyperlane V2 — brand continuity confirmedHyperlane V2 announcement — confirms brand transition from Abacus to Hyperlane as planned rebrandretrieved 2026-05-17
URL
Abacus Network Twitter handle — May 2022Twitter @abacus_network May 2022 — consistent brand lineage from Abacus to Hyperlane; no rug-alias patternretrieved 2026-05-17

Methodology #

Determine whether any social handle (Twitter, Discord) has been associated with a prior rugged or failed project under a different alias.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol hyperlane factor RD-F-118 score green collected_at 2026-05-16 23:03:56