Formal verification coverage

Jupiter Perpetual Exchange's assessment for RD-F-009 — scored red on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No formal verification (Certora, Kani, Halmos, or equivalent) found for the Jupiter Perps BPF program in any public source. Closed-source binary prevents independent FV. No FV reports exist. For Solana BPF, formal verification tooling is nascent and essentially zero protocols have FV coverage. 0% FV coverage per the factor definition.

Sources #

Docs
Jupiter Developer Platform — AuditsJupiter audits page lists only security audits (OtterSec, Sec3, Offside Labs) — no formal verification reports listedretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine the percentage of protocol-declared critical invariants covered by a formal verification proof (Certora Prover, Kani, Halmos, or equivalent).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol jupiter-perps factor RD-F-009 score red collected_at 2026-05-16 01:53:11