Formal verification coverage

Midas's assessment for RD-F-009 — scored red on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No formal verification (Certora Prover, Kani, Halmos, or equivalent) found in any Sherlock or Hacken audit documentation. Neither Sherlock 2024-05 nor 2024-08 README references formal proofs as part of prior security reviews. Hacken audit does not reference FV. 0% formal verification coverage of declared critical invariants.

Sources #

Audit
Hacken Midas Vault AuditHacken Dec-2023 audit — no FV mentionedretrieved 2026-05-16
GitHub
Sherlock 2024-08 READMESherlock 2024-08 README — no FV mentioned in prior security reviews sectionretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine the percentage of protocol-declared critical invariants covered by a formal verification proof (Certora Prover, Kani, Halmos, or equivalent).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol midas factor RD-F-009 score red collected_at 2026-05-16 09:34:55