Emergency-veto multisig present
Rocket Pool's assessment for RD-F-040 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Security Council can veto contract upgrades during the 1-week mandatory delay (RPIP-60), requiring 33% quorum. However, Security Council composition was not publicly established at Houston launch (guardian/team EOA was initial member). Formal multi-member structure developing but not confirmed as of assessment. Veto mechanism exists but effectiveness uncertain due to composition opacity.
Sources #
- GovernanceRPIP-60: Protocol Upgrade GuardrailsRPIP-60: Security Council can veto upgrades with 33% quorum during delay windowretrieved 2026-05-04
- Protocol DAO Security CouncilSecurity Council forum: guardian was sole initial member, composition debate ongoingretrieved 2026-05-04
Methodology #
Determine whether an emergency-veto or guardian multisig exists with power to cancel malicious proposals before execution.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol rocket-pool factor RD-F-040 score yellow collected_at 2026-05-04 15:40:28