Handle reuse across failed/rugged projects

Sanctum's assessment for RD-F-118 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

FP Lee (@soleconomist on X): consistent handle across Sanctum/unstake.it/Socean lineage since 2021; no prior rugged-project association under different alias. Jesse Cho: LinkedIn identity consistent with Bluebox/CapedBoys/Sanctum timeline. billythedummy: GitHub handle consistent with UW robotics affiliation since 2015; no failed protocol association found. No handle reuse across rugged projects for any named team member or top contributor.

Sources #

GitHub
billythedummy (Han Yang) — 11-year account, no failed project associationGitHub — billythedummyretrieved 2026-05-04
URL
FP Lee (@soleconomist) — consistent handle identityX — FP Lee (@soleconomist)retrieved 2026-05-04

Methodology #

Determine whether any social handle (Twitter, Discord) has been associated with a prior rugged or failed project under a different alias.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol sanctum factor RD-F-118 score green collected_at 2026-05-04 18:49:23