Audit count

Save (formerly Solend)'s assessment for RD-F-004 — scored red on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Only one confirmed public full audit (Kudelski v1.0, Sept 2021). Neodyme conducted a vulnerability disclosure (bounty event, not a full audit — not listed on neodyme.io/en/reports/). OtterSec published a targeted blog post investigation (not a full audit — not listed on osec.io). Sec3/Soteria = automated scanner. Effective distinct audit firm count = 1.

Sources #

Audit
Solend Audit v1.0 — Kudelski SecurityKudelski Solend v1.0 — only confirmed full-scope auditretrieved 2026-05-17
URL
Neodyme Reports IndexNeodyme reports index — Solend not listed (confirming no full Neodyme audit published)retrieved 2026-05-17
URL
Sec3 Solana Security AuditsSec3 audits page — Solend not listedretrieved 2026-05-17

Methodology #

Count the number of distinct audit firms whose reports cover any portion of the currently-deployed bytecode.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol save factor RD-F-004 score red collected_at 2026-05-17 15:20:15