defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Code complexity vs audit coverage

Sky Lending (formerly MakerDAO)'s assessment for RD-F-024 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

MCD system audited component-by-component across multiple dedicated engagements (ToB + PeckShield + Runtime Verification for core; Quantstamp + ToB + ChainSecurity for Liquidations 2.0; 7 ChainSecurity + 10 Cantina engagements + Sherlock contest for Endgame). Component approach appropriate for system scale. No evidence of under-auditing.

Sources #

  • URL
    https://audits.sherlock.xyz/contests/333retrieved 2026-04-27
  • URL
    https://developers.skyeco.com/security/security-measures/overview/retrieved 2026-04-27

Methodology #

Determine whether the cyclomatic complexity or LOC-per-audit-day ratio exceeds the curator-declared credibility threshold for the audit to be meaningful.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol sky-lending factor RD-F-024 score green collected_at 2026-04-28 00:43:18