ENS/NameStone identity bound to deployer
Uniswap (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-117 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
V3 deployer 0x6c9fc64a53c1b71fb3f9af64d1ae3a4931a5f4e9 does not display a bound ENS name per Etherscan ENS lookup. Address carries Etherscan exchange-validated name tag 'Uniswap V3: Old Deployer' providing equivalent public identity binding. Absence of ENS for a corporate deployer wallet is a minor gap, not a risk signal. Yellow per factor definition.
Detail #
Combined v2+v3 assessment. The ENS absence is the same finding as the prior v3-only assessment. It is scored yellow because the factor specifically checks for ENS/NameStone binding. The Etherscan protocol label is strong compensating evidence; this is the minimum-severity non-green finding in Cat 7 for Uniswap.
Sources #
- EtherscanUniswap V3: Old Deployer | EtherscanEtherscan deployer address page — ENS and name tagretrieved 2026-05-12
Methodology #
Determine whether the deployer address has a bound ENS or NameStone name resolvable to a verifiable identity.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →