Emergency-veto multisig present
Usual (USD0 / bUSD0 / USUAL)'s assessment for RD-F-040 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No documented emergency-veto multisig. Protocol has PAUSING_CONTRACTS_ROLE for circuit-breaker pause. Usual blog Jan 2025 referenced a 'veto threshold' in future governance design but no dedicated veto contract or multisig identified on-chain. Snapshot veto model (USUALx holders veto proposals) is described post-Jan 2025 but not an on-chain emergency control.
Sources #
- DocsUsual governance docs — veto model described, no on-chain contractdocs.usual.money/usual-products/usual-governance-token/usual-governance: references veto model but no on-chain veto multisig addressretrieved 2026-05-17
- Road to Parity blog — veto model commitmentUsual blog Jan 23, 2025: 'proposals submitted to DAO for veto before implementation' — describes future veto model, not existing on-chain controlretrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Determine whether an emergency-veto or guardian multisig exists with power to cancel malicious proposals before execution.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol usual factor RD-F-040 score yellow collected_at 2026-05-16 20:39:44